The symposium that Arne Mooers, Karen Hodges, and I organized on status and trends in Canadian biodiversity went very well, with speakers from across the country reviewing our progress towards the target set by the Convention on Biological Diversity, to reduce the rate of biodiversity loss by 2010. My talk tried to summarize status and trends for all of coastal British Columbia in 15 minutes! By the end of the session it was clear that while some indicators are going in the right direction (such as increases in protected areas), overall Canada has not met the targets that the country signed up to. This is not surprising, because a recent global analysis showed that this failure to reduce rates of biodiversity loss is generally true around the world. For Canada, climate change and increasing human populations featured prominently in most of the talks as major threats to biodiversity. We are continuing to work with Environment Canada on their formal reports on the biodiversity targets, including options for the future.
So, now that the conference is over, one of my enduring memories concerns the Alberta oil sands. The oil sands came up a lot, and after seeing David Schindler's plenary two days ago, I've decided that I'll have to see the oil sands for myself. The infamous tailings ponds are RIGHT beside the Athabasca River. A breach in a dike will send contaminants into the river, which flows northward via Great Slave Lake eventually to the Arctic Ocean, in a scenario that is too painful to think about. I wonder whether BP and the regulators in the Gulf of Mexico ever seriously thought about their risks. A thousand conservation biologists came away from that talk on Wednesday shaking their heads.